Redefining CyberSecurity

• Inside the DARPA AI Cyber Challenge: Securing Tomorrow’s Critical Infrastructure Through AI and Healthy Competition | An RSAC Conference 2025 Conversation with Andrew Carney | On Location Coverage with Sean Martin and Marco Ciappelli

  During RSAC Conference 2025, Andrew Carney, Program Manager at DARPA, and (remotely via video) Dr. Kathleen Fisher, Professor at Tufts University and Program Manager for the AI Cyber Challenge (AIxCC), guide attendees through an immersive experience called Northbridge—a fictional city designed to showcase the critical role of AI in securing infrastructure through the DARPA-led AI Cyber Challenge.Inside Northbridge: The Stakes Are RealNorthbridge simulates the future of cybersecurity, blending AI, infrastructure, and human collaboration. It’s not just a walkthrough — it’s a call to action. Through simulated attacks on water systems, healthcare networks, and cyber operations, visitors witness firsthand the tangible impacts of vulnerabilities in critical systems. Dr. Fisher emphasizes that the AI Cyber Challenge isn’t theoretical: the vulnerabilities competitors find and fix directly apply to real open-source software relied on by society today.The AI Cyber Challenge: Pairing Generative AI with Cyber ReasoningThe AI Cyber Challenge (AIxCC) invites teams from universities, small businesses, and consortiums to create cyber reasoning systems capable of autonomously identifying and fixing vulnerabilities. Leveraging leading foundation models from Anthropic, Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI, the teams operate with tight constraints—working with limited time, compute, and LLM credits—to uncover and patch vulnerabilities at scale. Remarkably, during semifinals, teams found and fixed nearly half of the synthetic vulnerabilities, and even discovered a real-world zero-day in SQLite.Building Toward DEFCON Finals and BeyondThe journey doesn’t end at RSA. As the teams prepare for the AIxCC finals at DEFCON 2025, DARPA is increasing the complexity of the challenge—and the available resources. Beyond the competition, a core goal is public benefit: all cyber reasoning systems developed through AIxCC will be open-sourced under permissive licenses, encouraging widespread adoption across industries and government sectors.From Competition to CollaborationCarney and Fisher stress that the ultimate victory isn’t in individual wins, but in strengthening cybersecurity collectively. Whether securing hospitals, water plants, or financial institutions, the future demands cooperation across public and private sectors.The Northbridge experience offers a powerful reminder: resilience in cybersecurity is built not through fear, but through innovation, collaboration, and a relentless drive to secure the systems we all depend on.___________Guest: Andrew Carney, AI Cyber Challenge Program Manager, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) | https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-carney-945458a6/Hosts:Sean Martin, Co-Founder at ITSPmagazine | Website: https://www.seanmartin.comMarco Ciappelli, Co-Founder at ITSPmagazine | Website: https://www.marcociappelli.com______________________Episode SponsorsThreatLocker: https://itspm.ag/threatlocker-r974Akamai: https://itspm.ag/akamailbwcBlackCloak: https://itspm.ag/itspbcwebSandboxAQ: https://itspm.ag/sandboxaq-j2enArcher: https://itspm.ag/rsaarchwebDropzone AI: https://itspm.ag/dropzoneai-641ISACA: https://itspm.ag/isaca-96808ObjectFirst: https://itspm.ag/object-first-2gjlEdera: https://itspm.ag/edera-434868___________ResourcesThe DARPA AIxCC Experience at RSAC 2025 Innovation Sandbox: https://www.rsaconference.com/usa/programs/sandbox/darpaLearn more and catch more stories from RSAC Conference 2025 coverage: https://www.itspmagazine.com/rsac25___________KEYWORDSandrew carney, kathleen fisher, marco ciappelli, sean martin, darpa, aixcc, cybersecurity, rsac 2025, defcon, ai cybersecurity, event coverage, on location, conference______________________Catch all of our event coverage: https://www.itspmagazine.com/technology-and-cybersecurity-conference-coverageWant to tell your Brand Story Briefing as part of our event coverage? Learn More 👉 https://itspm.ag/evtcovbrfWant Sean and Marco to be part of your event or conference? Let Us Know 👉 https://www.itspmagazine.com/contact-us

  --------  

  27:35
• Vibe Coding: Creativity Meets Risk in the Age of AI-Driven Development | A Conversation with Izar Tarandach | Redefining CyberSecurity with Sean Martin

  ⬥GUEST⬥Izar Tarandach, Sr. Principal Security Architect for a large media company | On LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/izartarandach/⬥HOST⬥Host: Sean Martin, Co-Founder at ITSPmagazine and Host of Redefining CyberSecurity Podcast | On LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/imsmartin/ | Website: https://www.seanmartin.com⬥EPISODE NOTES⬥In this episode of Redefining CyberSecurity, host Sean Martin sits down with Izar Tarandach, Senior Principal Security Architect at a major entertainment company, to unpack a concept gaining traction across some developer circles: vibe coding.Vibe coding, as discussed by Izar and Sean, isn’t just about AI-assisted development—it’s about coding based on a feeling or a flow, often driven by prompts to large language models (LLMs). It’s being explored in organizations from startups to large tech companies, where the appeal lies in speed and ease: describe what you want, and the machine generates the code. But this emerging approach is raising significant concerns, particularly in security circles.Izar, who co-hosts the Security Table podcast with Matt Coles and Chris Romeo, calls attention to the deeper implications of vibe coding. At the heart of his concern is the risk of ignoring past lessons. Generating code through AI may feel like progress, but without understanding what’s being written or how it fits into the broader architecture, teams risk reintroducing old vulnerabilities—at scale.One major issue: the assumption that code generated by AI is inherently good or secure. Izar challenges that notion, reminding listeners that today’s coding models function like junior developers—they may produce working code, but they’re also prone to mistakes, hallucinations, and a lack of contextual understanding. Worse yet, organizations may begin to skip traditional checks like code reviews and secure development lifecycles, assuming the machine already got it right.Sean highlights a potential opportunity—if used wisely, vibe coding could allow developers to focus more on outcomes and user needs, rather than syntax and structure. But even he acknowledges that, without collaboration and proper feedback loops, it’s more of a one-way zone than a true jam session between human and machine.Together, Sean and Izar explore whether security leaders are aware of vibe-coded systems running in their environments—and how they should respond. Their advice: assume you already have vibe-coded components in play, treat that code with the same scrutiny as anything else, and don’t trust blindly. Review it, test it, threat model it, and hold it to the same standards.Tune in to hear how this new style of development is reshaping conversations about security, responsibility, and collaboration in software engineering.⬥SPONSORS⬥LevelBlue: https://itspm.ag/attcybersecurity-3jdk3ThreatLocker: https://itspm.ag/threatlocker-r974⬥RESOURCES⬥Inspiring LinkedIn Post — https://www.linkedin.com/posts/izartarandach_sigh-vibecoding-when-will-we-be-able-activity-7308105048926879744-fNMSSecurity Table Podcast: Vibe Coding: What Could Possibly Go Wrong? — https://securitytable.buzzsprout.com/2094080/episodes/16861651-vibe-coding-what-could-possibly-go-wrongWebinar: Secure Coding = Developer Power, An ITSPmagazine Webinar with Manicode Security — https://www.crowdcast.io/c/secure-coding-equals-developer-power-how-to-convince-your-boss-to-invest-in-you-an-itspmagazine-webinar-with-manicode-security-ad147fba034a⬥ADDITIONAL INFORMATION⬥✨ More Redefining CyberSecurity Podcast: 🎧 https://www.seanmartin.com/redefining-cybersecurity-podcastRedefining CyberSecurity Podcast on YouTube:📺 https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnYu0psdcllS9aVGdiakVss9u7xgYDKYqInterested in sponsoring this show with a podcast ad placement? Learn more:👉 https://itspm.ag/podadplc

  --------  

  35:52
• Building and Securing Intelligent Workflows: Why Your AI Strategy Needs Agentic AI Threat Modeling and a Zero Trust Mindset | A Conversation with Ken Huang | Redefining CyberSecurity with Sean Martin

  ⬥GUEST⬥Ken Huang, Co-Chair, AI Safety Working Groups at Cloud Security Alliance | On LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kenhuang8/⬥HOST⬥Host: Sean Martin, Co-Founder at ITSPmagazine and Host of Redefining CyberSecurity Podcast | On LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/imsmartin/ | Website: https://www.seanmartin.com⬥EPISODE NOTES⬥In this episode of Redefining CyberSecurity, host Sean Martin speaks with Ken Huang, Co-Chair of the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) AI Working Group and author of several books including Generative AI Security and the upcoming Agent AI: Theory and Practice. The conversation centers on what agentic AI is, how it is being implemented, and what security, development, and business leaders need to consider as adoption grows.Agentic AI refers to systems that can autonomously plan, execute, and adapt tasks using large language models (LLMs) and integrated tools. Unlike traditional chatbots, agentic systems handle multi-step workflows, delegate tasks to specialized agents, and dynamically respond to inputs using tools like vector databases or APIs. This creates new possibilities for business automation but also introduces complex security and governance challenges.Practical Applications and Emerging Use CasesKen outlines current use cases where agentic AI is being applied: startups using agentic models to support scientific research, enterprise tools like Salesforce’s AgentForce automating workflows, and internal chatbots acting as co-workers by tapping into proprietary data. As agentic AI matures, these systems may manage travel bookings, orchestrate ticketing operations, or even assist in robotic engineering—all with minimal human intervention.Implications for Development and Security TeamsDevelopment teams adopting agentic AI frameworks—such as AutoGen or CrewAI—must recognize that most do not come with out-of-the-box security controls. Ken emphasizes the need for SDKs that add authentication, monitoring, and access controls. For IT and security operations, agentic systems challenge traditional boundaries; agents often span across cloud environments, demanding a zero-trust mindset and dynamic policy enforcement.Security leaders are urged to rethink their programs. Agentic systems must be validated for accuracy, reliability, and risk—especially when multiple agents operate together. Threat modeling and continuous risk assessment are no longer optional. Enterprises are encouraged to start small: deploy a single-agent system, understand the workflow, validate security controls, and scale as needed.The Call for Collaboration and Mindset ShiftAgentic AI isn’t just a technological shift—it requires a cultural one. Huang recommends cross-functional engagement and alignment with working groups at CSA, OWASP, and other communities to build resilient frameworks and avoid duplicated effort. Zero Trust becomes more than an architecture—it becomes a guiding principle for how agentic AI is developed, deployed, and defended.⬥SPONSORS⬥LevelBlue: https://itspm.ag/attcybersecurity-3jdk3ThreatLocker: https://itspm.ag/threatlocker-r974⬥RESOURCES⬥BOOK | Generative AI Security: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-54252-7BOOK | Agentic AI: Theories and Practices, to be published August by Springer: https://link.springer.com/book/9783031900259BOOK | The Handbook of CAIO (with a business focus): https://www.amazon.com/Handbook-Chief-AI-Officers-Revolution/dp/B0DFYNXGMRMore books at Amazon, including books published by Cambridge University Press and John Wiley, etc.: https://www.amazon.com/stores/Ken-Huang/author/B0D3J7L7GNVideo Course Mentioned During this Episode: "Generative AI for Cybersecurity" video course by EC-Council with 255 people rated averaged 5 starts: https://codered.eccouncil.org/course/generative-ai-for-cybersecurity-course?logged=falsePodcast: The 2025 OWASP Top 10 for LLMs: What’s Changed and Why It Matters | A Conversation with Sandy Dunn and Rock Lambros⬥ADDITIONAL INFORMATION⬥✨ More Redefining CyberSecurity Podcast: 🎧 https://www.seanmartin.com/redefining-cybersecurity-podcastRedefining CyberSecurity Podcast on YouTube:📺 https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnYu0psdcllS9aVGdiakVss9u7xgYDKYqInterested in sponsoring this show with a podcast ad placement? Learn more:👉 https://itspm.ag/podadplc

  --------  

  43:10
• Detection vs. Noise: What MITRE ATT&CK Evaluations Reveal About Your Security Tools | A Conversation with Allie Mellen | Redefining CyberSecurity with Sean Martin

  ⬥GUEST⬥Allie Mellen, Principal Analyst,  Forrester | On LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/hackerxbella/⬥HOST⬥Host: Sean Martin, Co-Founder at ITSPmagazine and Host of Redefining CyberSecurity Podcast | On ITSPmagazine: https://www.itspmagazine.com/sean-martin⬥EPISODE NOTES⬥In this episode, Allie Mellen, Principal Analyst on the Security and Risk Team at Forrester, joins Sean Martin to discuss the latest results from the MITRE ATT&CK Ingenuity Evaluations and what they reveal about detection and response technologies.The Role of MITRE ATT&CK EvaluationsMITRE ATT&CK is a widely adopted framework that maps out the tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) used by threat actors. Security vendors use it to improve detection capabilities, and organizations rely on it to assess their security posture. The MITRE Ingenuity Evaluations test how different security tools detect and respond to simulated attacks, helping organizations understand their strengths and gaps.Mellen emphasizes that MITRE’s evaluations do not assign scores or rank vendors, which allows security leaders to focus on analyzing performance rather than chasing a “winner.” Instead, organizations must assess raw data to determine how well a tool aligns with their needs.Alert Volume and the Cost of Security DataOne key insight from this year’s evaluation is the significant variation in alert volume among vendors. Some solutions generate thousands of alerts for a single attack scenario, while others consolidate related activity into just a handful of actionable incidents. Mellen notes that excessive alerting contributes to analyst burnout and operational inefficiencies, making alert volume a critical metric to assess.Forrester’s analysis includes a cost calculator that estimates the financial impact of alert ingestion into a SIEM. The results highlight how certain vendors create a massive data burden, leading to increased costs for organizations trying to balance security effectiveness with budget constraints.The Shift Toward Detection and Response EngineeringMellen stresses the importance of detection engineering, where security teams take a structured approach to developing and maintaining high-quality detection rules. Instead of passively consuming vendor-generated alerts, teams must actively refine and tune detections to align with real threats while minimizing noise.Detection and response should also be tightly integrated. Forrester’s research advocates linking every detection to a corresponding response playbook. By automating these processes through security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) solutions, teams can accelerate investigations and reduce manual workloads.Vendor Claims and the Reality of Security ToolsWhile many vendors promote their performance in the MITRE ATT&CK Evaluations, Mellen cautions against taking marketing claims at face value. Organizations should review MITRE’s raw evaluation data, including screenshots and alert details, to get an unbiased view of how a tool operates in practice.For security leaders, these evaluations offer an opportunity to reassess their detection strategy, optimize alert management, and ensure their investments in security tools align with operational needs.For a deeper dive into these insights, including discussions on AI-driven correlation, alert fatigue, and security team efficiency, listen to the full episode.⬥SPONSORS⬥LevelBlue: https://itspm.ag/attcybersecurity-3jdk3ThreatLocker: https://itspm.ag/threatlocker-r974⬥RESOURCES⬥Inspiring Post: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/hackerxbella_go-beyond-the-mitre-attck-evaluation-to-activity-7295460112935075845-N8GW/Blog | Go Beyond The MITRE ATT&CK Evaluation To The True Cost Of Alert Volumes: https://www.forrester.com/blogs/go-beyond-the-mitre-attck-evaluation-to-the-true-cost-of-alert-volumes/⬥ADDITIONAL INFORMATION⬥✨ More Redefining CyberSecurity Podcast: 🎧 https://www.itspmagazine.com/redefining-cybersecurity-podcastRedefining CyberSecurity Podcast on YouTube:📺 https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnYu0psdcllS9aVGdiakVss9u7xgYDKYqInterested in sponsoring this show with a podcast ad placement? Learn more:👉 https://itspm.ag/podadplc

  --------  

  36:06
• The Cyber Resilience Act: How the EU is Reshaping Digital Product Security | A Conversation with Sarah Fluchs | Redefining CyberSecurity with Sean Martin

  ⬥GUEST⬥Sarah Fluchs, CTO at admeritia | CRA Expert Group at EU Commission | On LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarah-fluchs/⬥HOST⬥Host: Sean Martin, Co-Founder at ITSPmagazine [@ITSPmagazine] and Host of Redefining CyberSecurity Podcast [@RedefiningCyber] | On ITSPmagazine: https://www.itspmagazine.com/sean-martin⬥EPISODE NOTES⬥The European Commission’s Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) introduces a regulatory framework designed to improve the security of digital products sold within the European Union. In a recent episode of Redefining CyberSecurity, host Sean Martin spoke with Sarah Fluchs, Chief Technology Officer at admeritia and a member of the CRA expert group at the EU Commission. Fluchs, who has spent her career in industrial control system cybersecurity, offers critical insights into what the CRA means for manufacturers, retailers, and consumers.A Broad Scope: More Than Just Industrial AutomationUnlike previous security regulations that focused on specific sectors, the CRA applies to virtually all digital products. Fluchs emphasizes that if a device is digital and sold in the EU, it likely falls under the CRA’s requirements. From smartwatches and baby monitors to firewalls and industrial control systems, the regulation covers a wide array of consumer and business-facing products.The CRA also extends beyond just hardware—software and services required for product functionality (such as cloud-based components) are also in scope. This broad application is part of what makes the regulation so impactful. Manufacturers now face mandatory cybersecurity requirements that will shape product design, development, and post-sale support.What the CRA RequiresThe CRA introduces mandatory cybersecurity standards across the product lifecycle. Manufacturers will need to:Ensure products are free from known, exploitable vulnerabilities at the time of release.Implement security by design, considering cybersecurity from the earliest stages of product development.Provide security patches for the product’s defined lifecycle, with a minimum of five years unless justified otherwise.Maintain a vulnerability disclosure process, ensuring consumers and authorities are informed of security risks.Include cybersecurity documentation, requiring manufacturers to provide detailed security instructions to users.Fluchs notes that these requirements align with established security best practices. For businesses already committed to cybersecurity, the CRA should feel like a structured extension of what they are already doing, rather than a disruptive change.Compliance Challenges: No Detailed Checklist YetOne of the biggest concerns among manufacturers is the lack of detailed compliance guidance. While other EU regulations provide extensive technical specifications, the CRA’s security requirements span just one and a half pages. This ambiguity is intentional—it allows flexibility across different industries—but it also creates uncertainty.To address this, the EU will introduce harmonized standards to help manufacturers interpret the CRA. However, with tight deadlines, many of these standards may not be ready before enforcement begins. As a result, companies will need to conduct their own cybersecurity risk assessments and demonstrate due diligence in securing their products.The Impact on Critical Infrastructure and Industrial SystemsWhile the CRA is not specifically a critical infrastructure regulation, it has major implications for industrial environments. Operators of critical systems, such as utilities and manufacturing plants, will benefit from stronger security in the components they rely on.Fluchs highlights that many security gaps in industrial environments stem from weak product security. The CRA aims to fix this by ensuring that manufacturers, rather than operators, bear the responsibility for secure-by-design components. This shift could significantly reduce cybersecurity risks for organizations that rely on complex supply chains.A Security Milestone: Holding Manufacturers AccountableThe CRA represents a fundamental shift in cybersecurity responsibility. For the first time, manufacturers, importers, and retailers must guarantee the security of their products or risk being banned from selling in the EU.Fluchs points out that while the burden of compliance is significant, the benefits for consumers and businesses will be substantial. Security-conscious companies may even gain a competitive advantage, as customers start to prioritize products that meet CRA security standards.For those in the industry wondering how strictly the EU will enforce compliance, Fluchs reassures that the goal is not to punish manufacturers for small mistakes. Instead, the EU Commission aims to improve cybersecurity without unnecessary bureaucracy.The Bottom LineThe Cyber Resilience Act is set to reshape cybersecurity expectations for digital products. While manufacturers face new compliance challenges, consumers and businesses will benefit from stronger security measures, better vulnerability management, and increased transparency.Want to learn more? Listen to the full episode of Redefining CyberSecurity with Sean Martin and Sarah Fluchs to hear more insights into the CRA and what it means for the future of cybersecurity.⬥SPONSORS⬥LevelBlue: https://itspm.ag/attcybersecurity-3jdk3ThreatLocker: https://itspm.ag/threatlocker-r974⬥RESOURCES⬥Inspiring Post: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/sarah-fluchs_aaand-its-official-the-cyber-resilience-activity-7250162223493300224-zECA/Adopted CRA text: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/PE-100-2023-INIT/en/pdfA list of Sarah's blog posts to get your CRA knowledge up to speed:1️⃣ Introduction to the CRA, the CE marking, and the regulatory ecosystem around it: https://fluchsfriction.medium.com/eu-cyber-resilience-act-9e092fffbd732️⃣ Explanation how the standards ("harmonised European norms, hEN") are defined that will detail the actual cybersecurity requirements in the CRA (2023): https://fluchsfriction.medium.com/what-cybersecurity-standards-will-products-in-the-eu-soon-have-to-meet-590854ba3c8c3️⃣ Overview of the essential requirements outlined in the CRA (2024): https://fluchsfriction.medium.com/what-the-cyber-resilience-act-requires-from-manufacturers-0ee0b917d2094️⃣ Overview of the global product security regulation landscape and how the CRA fits into it (2024): https://fluchsfriction.medium.com/product-security-regulation-in-2024-93ddc6dd89005️⃣ Good-practice example for the "information and instructions to the user," one of the central documentations that need to be written for CRA compliance and the only one that must be provided to the product's users (2024): https://fluchsfriction.medium.com/how-to-be-cra-compliant-and-make-your-critical-infrastructure-clients-happy-441ecd859f52⬥ADDITIONAL INFORMATION⬥✨ More Redefining CyberSecurity: 🎧 https://www.itspmagazine.com/redefining-cybersecurity-podcastRedefining CyberSecurity Podcast on YouTube:📺 https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnYu0psdcllS9aVGdiakVss9u7xgYDKYqInterested in sponsoring this show with an ad placement in the podcast? Learn more:👉 https://itspm.ag/podadplc

  --------  

  44:10

Plus de podcasts Technologies

Podcasts tendance de Technologies

À propos de Redefining CyberSecurity