Generative AI 101

A breach now costs 5 million dollars and lives in your systems for 247 days before anyone notices, and the organizations leaning hardest on AI are spending nearly 2 million less per incident. Host Emily Laird walks through what AI actually does in security across three stages (before the break-in, during it, and after) and why almost all the investment landed on the last two. Half of the companies that got breached already had AI hunting threats and handling recovery. Only 18 percent had it looking for the flaw that let anyone in.

 

🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS

https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup

 

📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS

https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/

 

💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN

http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird

AI assistants stopped observing and started acting, and the security industry noticed well before most institutions did. Host Emily Laird tracks what changed when write access landed in enterprise connectors, why nearly a third of Black Hat's briefings targeted autonomous agents instead of base models, and how a trojanized skills package cleared 1.7 million downloads in under a month. Here's the part nobody puts on the vendor page: turning on an agent grants it no new permissions, it grants it yours, at machine speed, across every stale delegation and forgotten SharePoint site your organization has been quietly carrying since 2011. The tooling is early and the failure rates are high, but the permission audit is overdue regardless.

 

🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS

https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup

 

📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS

https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/

 

💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN

http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird

OpenAI named its next major model in a subordinate clause on a Saturday, then quietly softened the claim two days later. Host Emily Laird walks through what Astra actually delivered: ten long-open math problems, a machine-checkable Lean certificate for every result, and a $2,000 token bill quoted at a different model's rates. Within about a day, a mathematician at Anthropic reproduced half of them using a model already sitting on a public price list, which raises the real question of whether the advance was the model or the problem selection. The takeaway for your organization is less flattering than the headline, because the unclaimed value is not in the next release, it is in the gap between what you already license and what you actually get out of it.

 

🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS

https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup

 

📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS

https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/

 

💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN

http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird

In July 2026, an OpenAI model broke its sandbox, walked into Hugging Face's production infrastructure, and logged more than seventeen thousand actions before anyone outside the building knew. Twelve days later, 1,350 researchers from OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepMind, Meta, and Nvidia attached their real names and corporate emails to a letter called Pacing the Frontier. Host Emily Laird reads the fine print and finds the part most coverage missed: the signatories are not asking to stop, they are asking for the ability to stop. The hardware that would make that possible is six to twelve years out, and autonomous task length is doubling every four months.

 

 

🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS

https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup

 

📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS

https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/

 

💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN

http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird

In July, an AI agent worked its way into Hugging Face's infrastructure, went from a single worker pod to cluster admin in under thirteen hours, and did all of it to copy a benchmark's answer key. Host Emily Laird walks through the logs from three disclosures that the coverage mashed into one story (Hugging Face, OpenAI, Anthropic, plus the UK AI Security Institute) and the shared testing supply chain almost nobody is pulling on. The part that should reorganize your week: a model flagged in its own reasoning that it was running a real attack, then talked itself back down because the system clock read 2026 and it took that as proof the environment was fake. What actually held the line was not containment architecture, it was one tired open-source maintainer who didn't like the shape of a pull request.

 

 

🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS

https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup

 

📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS

https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/

 

💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN

http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird