The Emily Show

Get 15% off OneSkin with the code LAWNERD at https://www.oneskin.co/lawnerd #oneskinpod #ad

Get 40% off select Lola Blankets products at https://Lolablankets.com with code LAWNERD at checkout. Experience the world’s #1 blanket with Lola Blankets. #ad

In this episode, we break down the ongoing Los Angeles preliminary hearing of the singer David Burke (D4VD), who faces serious charges including first-degree special circumstance murder, continuous sexual abuse of a minor under 14, and unlawful mutilation of human remains. Details the nature of a preliminary hearing as a public probable cause hearing rather than a trial, expecting the judge to hold the defendant to answer on all charges. We highlight key evidence presented by the prosecution—such as dental records used for identifying the victim, financial records tied to the pecuniary gain circumstance, DNA matched to blood in a Tesla and garage, and disturbing text messages documenting grooming and travel. We also explain the downstream legal proceedings, including how the district attorney's office committee will determine whether to seek the death penalty and how the 60-day speedy trial clock triggers once the case is bound over for trial.

RESOURCES

d4vd Preliminary Hearing Brief - https://youtu.be/XnOP9hfjFpU

Kouri Richins Trial - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gIKTiEBENmlYTBxjH_fbLUO

Bryan Kohberger Case - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKASBczV3CsUx-t5oRAK0ca

Nick Reiner Case - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gJcmc7O-aneMYGqj0QcBq_X
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Go to https://incogni.com/EMILY and use code EMILY to get 60% off annual plans.

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D. Baker YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/vBsUzuAjj6s

This Case Brief covers a status hearing in the O'Keefe v. Read Wrongful Death litigation, focusing on the court's recent discovery orders and the ongoing disputes regarding deposition dissemination. Emily breaks down the judge's controversial discovery order—which notably lifted the stay on Michael Proctor's deposition via a "sassy" footnote—and discusses the subsequent status conference from July 16, 2026, where parties continued to struggle with discovery timelines and potential dispositive motions.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Go to https://incogni.com/EMILY and use code EMILY to get 60% off annual plans.

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D. Baker YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/GE1wZT_PDjE

This Case Brief details the state of Florida's response to Sarah Boone's appeal following her conviction and life sentence for second-degree murder, where she trapped the victim, Jorge Torres, in a suitcase. The state addresses several points raised by the defense, including claims that the trial court improperly limited opening statements regarding a battered spouse syndrome defense, misapplied a discovery violation remedy, and erred in its jury instructions on the initial aggressor exception to self-defense. The state argues that the trial court acted within its wide discretion, that the defense failed to properly preserve certain objections at trial, and that expert testimony regarding Boone's lack of immediate fear during the incident was permissible.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D. Baker YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/Q6X5fgMQG2k

During a July 13, 2026, criminal court hearing, defense attorney Alan Jackson argued for the disqualification of special prosecutor Mr. Cosgrove from any further involvement regarding Karen Read's cell phone search warrant and witness intimidation investigation. Jackson contended that Cosgrove breached the required standard of prosecutorial independence by admitting coordination with the conflicted Norfolk County District Attorney's Office. In response, Cosgrove argued that Read lacks standing because there is no actual conflict, as his prosecution focuses on Aidan Kearney rather than Read. He further attempted to discredit the defense by citing prior judicial findings regarding a lack of candor. Ultimately, the judge took the matter under advisement amid ongoing discovery disputes over why Read's cell phones have not yet been returned despite multiple court orders.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D. Baker YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/Q6X5fgMQG2k

During a July 10th court hearing, the court addressed two primary motions regarding discovery disputes. First, in Karen Read's motion to compel Colin Albert's deposition, the court delayed its ruling to gather more information regarding Albert's availability during his military basic training, while also ordering his attorneys to put recent updates about his scheduling into writing for the opposing counsel. Second, regarding the O'Keefe party's motion to compel further answers from Karen Read, the judge pushed the attorneys to privately discuss narrowing the scope of requested medical records and financial documents. After a brief sidebar, the parties reached an agreement to table the motion for a later date, leading the speaker to observe that the attorneys on both sides seem overly reliant on the court to resolve communications that could otherwise be handled independently.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices